The decision to give permission to appeal in Re K (children) 2013 might well become an important one, when the full appeal is heard.
I have written about whether the statutory position that a parent can give evidence in care proceedings and that evidence may only be used in a criminal trial for perjury – thus giving a preservation against self-incrimination, has been badly eroded
and Re K is a very good example of how this can make a massive difference in the case.
The father in Re K had been at the wrong end of a fact-finding hearing about what appear to be very grave allegations (there’s reference to a stabbing and a fire) in private law proceedings – it appears that the original allegations and original findings were that mother had stabbed father and set his home on fire, but these findings were fundamentally reversed…
View original post 1,008 more words