CAFCASS: From “Not fit for Purpose” to “beyond reform & must be abolished”

Over recent Months I have posted a variety of articles, from News, Media & independent sites, on British Social Care standards.  It might not be shocking to read about the Local Authority and their failings; but  may [or may not] come as a surprise to read that Cafcass, the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service, has been deemed “beyond reform and must be abolished

It was only November 11, 201 that the London Evening Standard reported PAC findings of Cafcass being “not fit for purpose”  [see the link at the end of myblog] Now, upon a further, more in depth review, the future of Cafcass is no more.

The following article has been taken from a site, for everyone in Social Care,  Camila Pemberton reports on the findings of the most recent deposition, held earlier last week.

Thank you for visiting this page, Michelle “My*Angel” Anthony

* I will be reposting my articles on Cafcass from recent months that are in relation to this matter

Cafcass is ‘beyond reform’ and must be abolished

Reports Camilla Pemberton [] Friday 25 March 2011 12:00

Family courts body Cafcass is now “beyond reform” and should be abolished, a committee of MPs was told this week.
Read more below or click on the link at the end of this post for direct access to the original article:

Appearing before the Justice Select Committee, Martha Cover, respresenting the Interdisciplinary Alliance for Children – a group of 18 organisations, including Nagalro and the Association of Lawyers for Children – told MPs: “We have considered the possibility of reform rather than abolition, but we have come to the conclusion that [Cafcass’ inability] to change to meet the concerns of the other partners in the family justice system is such that we simply have to start again.”

Cafass logo

From 'Unfit for Purpose' to 'Beyond Reform'

Cover blamed Cafcass’s “overly centralised service and top heavy, hierarchical managerial structure”, which she claimed does not sufficiently value the independence and autonomy of family court guardians and family court reporters”.

“It is also an extremely expensive model to deliver,” she added, before revealing an alternative model to Cafcass, put forward by the Alliance, which MPs were told could deliver a better service, at reduced costs, by “removing huge layers of management”.

She described the alternative model as high trust professionals working in consortia, of 40 or 50 people, inked to the local care centres.

“We simply do not accept that the various strata of management and indeed the ideology of Cafcass are necessary for these types of professional people.”

She claimed 46% of Cafcass staff, based in local offices, were not frontline practitioners.

MPs questioned Cover on the viability of the new model and the risk of stripping away layers of management, asking her why Cafcass could not be reformed. She replied: “We’ve thought about ‘Cafcass lite’ or ‘the organisation formally known as Cafcass’, but we fear the culture and management ethos is so damaged that [it is not possible].”

The Alliance’s recommendations come just ahead of the Family Justice Review, which is due to publish its interim report next week. There has been widespread speculation about how the Review will impact upon Cafcass’ future.

Anthony Douglas, chief executive of Cafcass, defended the organisation’s performance before the committee. “We deal with 140,000 children every year – about the largest number of children any single organisation is dealing with. This is very difficult work and often child protection work is not done that well…in local authorities or across the board.

“Our performance, compared with a year ago, has improved considerably. One year ago we had over 1,000 unallocated cases…we now have just 7. We are providing a good service to the vast majority of children…we are fit for purpose.”

A Cafcass spokesperson also refuted the Alliance’s claims. “Over 90 per cent of our staff in local offices are frontline staff, delivering a direct service to children and families. Within our existing budget we’ve absorbed a massive increase in cases, with productivity up 12%.”

Cafcass Banner Image

Cafcass actually "cafcan't" after IAC declares them beyond repair

The spokesperson claimed Cafcass had a lean management structure but said the organisation also recognised that practitioners working on complex cases needed access to experienced managers with whom they could discuss cases and get support.

“All agencies, and not just Cafcass continue to be under pressure and we look forward to the recommendations of the Family Justice Review which will be looking at how the system as a whole, and not just the vital work Cafcass undertakes, can be improved for families and their children,” the spokesperson said.

* click on the link below for the original article by Pemberton

Related articles

Family justice findings will accompany Munro report

Family justice review chair David Norgrove: ‘we can’t go on like this’

One response to “CAFCASS: From “Not fit for Purpose” to “beyond reform & must be abolished”

  1. This comes as no surprise to me; especially following PAC declaring them “unfit for purpose” in parliament in recent months. When Cafcass took over from the Independent Guardians it became clear that the organization was quite insestuous with Local Authorities around the country. There are some great Guardians [as with Social Workers] but they remain invisible as long as they do their jobs; unfortunately its the other individuals, whom make up their own rules as they go along, who give them a bad stereo type. The Officers, who are trying to make the system work for the Children, are forced to pick up the slack or “mend” was has been broken. In my opinion, this is a great cause to their backload of work – especially since the Peter and Victoria episodes.

    Hopefully there will be heedance from the reports and an organization truly independent of Local Authority, and with Guardians who work with Families and not just Social Workers, will emerge…for our children !

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s